Scale 4k monitor mac how to#
Scale 4k monitor mac software#
Scale 4k monitor mac Pc#
Scale 4k monitor mac windows#

Scale 4k monitor mac software#

In general software that is programmed poorly and doesn't follow Microsoft's recommendations can have problems with scaling.

Scale 4k monitor mac windows#

I use RemotePC from iDrive for PCs I need to access over the Internet (or are on my local net but have Windows Home.) I use Windows Remote Desktop for local computers on my LAN (that run Windows Pro).

It sounds like whatever software you are using for remote control isn't handling scaling properly. I've been using a 4K 14' laptop for more than a year and I don't have problems with text being too small to read. 27 inch is the smallest I'd want for 4k, and I've been thinking for a year now that 32 inch is probably the 4k 'sweet spot' like 24 inch seems for 2k. I'm thinking 24 inch is about the biggest I want for 2k (and I have four of these monitors in another office - they look great). It depends on what you are looking at, and if it has a scaling option. I'm ready to pull out a magnifying glass to read some of the text on these remote-controlled PC's. One example is remote control of PC's, which I do a lot of for work.

Scale 4k monitor mac how to#

(Or I haven't yet learned how to scale them). The 4k is much 'smoother', but there are certainly times that I struggle to view certain things that don't scale well. The 2K just seems too big for the resolution, but it does make some things easier to read. The main one has two 4K 27 inch monitors. I have two PC's in my office (main and backup). Good news is that the monitors mentioned above only cost (USD) $400, $200 and $120, so the screen decisions are not financially constrained, as they would have been in the days of large CRT screens. If restricted to a single monitor, I'd go for 27' and 2560x1440. The 2k resolution is no handicap for photo editing.Р В РІР‚СњР вЂ™Р’В¬ompleting the story, my 24' 2k screen is ideal for its primary use, which is email. On a more day-to-day computer, the 27' 2k screen at a longer viewing distance is just about right. Viewing distance is quite close, so for a single application such as MS-Word, I often operate in a window that is equivalent to a 24' monitor. I have a 28' 4k that is used for a variety of applications, including multi-windowed text, gaming, Web and photo stuff. That would cost you nothing but time to see if it works for you. As I type this screed on the 4k a football game is streaming on the other-it can be addictive to work that way.Р В РІР‚СњР В РІР‚С›nother option is to learn to use multiple pre-set virtual desktops and switch between them. I find it the most efficient way to work when I need to use multiple apps simultaneously and move data between them, like all business uses.

You might look into using a dual monitor setup if your GPU can support that.

That would improve text sharpness over the 1200 (really 1080) Dell, should work with your GPUs, but don't expect miracles with multiple open apps on a 27 inch screen because the screen acreage is not all that different from 24 inches I think you would be happiest with a 27 inch or larger 1440 monitor. I am sitting in front of a 27 inch 4k Dell and to its right your Dell, both calibrated to the same brightness et al running off a desktop AMD GPU so no lack of GPU horsepower. Intel iGPUs are anemic no matter what the specs say but can handle 1440. I suggest reading the most detailed tech reviews you can find one place to start is here, but there are others:Р В РІР‚СњР В РІР‚РЋirstly your computers may not have the GPU horsepower to run 4k stably without tearing, slow frames or other artifacts. There are plenty of good monitor choices in the 27' size within your budget the problem would be choosing the best for your needs. I'd want 4K at the 27' size, especially if much of what I was doing was text-oriented the higher res gives sharper, better-formed characters IMO. I assume scaling would work for most applications on either platform.

Scale 4k monitor mac Pc#

I use both an older Mac mini and a new PC laptop, both with integrated Intel graphics. I usually sit 20-24' from the monitor, and the text looks decent at 24' on the Dell. My concern is whether 4K or 2560x1440 is a better compromise. It is a 1920x1200 display (I appreciate the aspect ratio), but I am looking at 27'-28' monitors, basically for the additional width. I need a bit more screen space for my text work - from word processing and spreadsheets to a fair amount of time in Blackboard (a learning management system) - than on the 24' Dell U2415 I presently have been using for the last few years. I do not have the space for two monitors. I shoot JPG/RAW for which I do post processing. I do a lot of text work on my monitor, but photography, too.